Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rutz et al v. Marth
as 1:2020cv00051
Defendant:
ROALD MARTH
Plaintiff:
LOWELL RUTZ and CONNIE RUTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Krauth et al
as 4:2016cv00481
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jennifer Lynn Krauth, Brian Krauth, William Lowell Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Rosenquist v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv00126
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Richard Lowell Rosenquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rosenquist v. United States of America
as 4:2011cv00474
Petitioner:
Richard Lowell Rosenquist
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hancher et al
as 5:2011cv04005
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Lowell Gene (Bob) Hancher, Commerce Street Venture Group, Inc, Edward T Whelan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Cycle Country Accessories Corporation v. Hancher et al
as 5:2010cv04057
Plaintiff:
Cycle Country Accessories Corporation
Defendant:
Lowell G Hancher, Jr and Commerce Street Venture Group, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linden v. CNH America LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00019
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lowell Linden, Jr. and Thomas Lowell Linden, Jr.
Defendant:
CNH America LLC and Indiana Mills & Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Yates v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2009cv03004
Petitioner:
Duane Yates
Respondent:
John Baldwin, Cornell Smith, John Ault and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. Brandt
as 4:2008cv00139
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph Harris
Defendant:
Lowell Brandt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. Brandt et al
as 1:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph Harris
Defendant:
Lowell Brandt, Ed O Brien, Pradeep Saeswat and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
