Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Andrews v. MGC Mortgage, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 1:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrews
Defendant:
MGC Mortgage, Inc. and LPP Mortgage Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Rebekah Gentry-Youngblood v. LPP Mortgage, Ltd., et al
as 16-6046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REBEKAH GENTRY-YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
LPP MORTGAGE, LTD., JAMIE MORTON, MATTHEW GRAVES and others
Castelli et al v. MGC Mortgage Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00442
Defendant:
MGC Mortgage Inc and LPP Mortgage Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Castelli, Barbara Castelli and Louis Castelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rebekah Gentry-Youngblood v. MCG Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
Rebekah Gentry-Youngblood
Defendant:
MCG Mortgage, Inc. , Cenlar , FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
LPP Mortgate, LTD. v. Vanderschaaf et al
as 3:2013cv00882
Plaintiff:
LPP Mortgage, LTD.
Defendant:
Clair D. Vanderschaaf, Jr., Patricia Vanderschaaf and Victor L. Bishara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LLP Mortgage Ltd. v. Eatherly
as 3:2013cv00513
Plaintiff:
LPP Mortgage Ltd.
Defendant:
J. D. Eatherly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. MS Partnership et al
as 3:2012cv01307
Plaintiff:
LPP Mortgage Ltd.
Defendant:
MS Partnership, Mack H. McClung and James C. Spangler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. Gill
as 3:2011cv00981
Plaintiff:
LPP Mortgage, Ltd.
Defendant:
Connie Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hermitage Developers, Inc. et al v. LPP Mortgage, Ltd.
as 3:2010cv01183
Plaintiff:
Hermitage Developers, Inc. and Mark Koester
Defendant:
LPP Mortgage, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. 771 Polaris, Ltd et al
as 2:2010cv00929
Plaintiff:
LPP Mortgage Ltd.
Defendant:
771 Polaris, Ltd, The Slane Company, Ltd n/k/a 261 Real Estate Group, Ltd., Charles J. Slane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
