Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv02252
Plaintiff: UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER INC., LUBBOCK COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT doing business as UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
FROEDTERT MEMORIAL LUTHERAN HOSPITAL, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv02237
Plaintiff: FROEDTERT MEMORIAL LUTHERAN HOSPITAL, INC., AKRON GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER, BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL doing business as BEAUMONT HOSPITAL FARMINGTON and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Perry Furgason v. Lubbock County Hospital District d/b/a UMC Health System
as 5:2022cv00087
Plaintiff: PERRY FURGASON
Defendant: UMC Health System of Lubbock and Lubbock County Hospital District doing business as UMC Health System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00003
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Caldwell v. Lubbock County Hospital District
as 5:2021cv00092
Defendant: UMC Health Network, Inc. and Lubbock County Hospital District
Plaintiff: Lisa Caldwell
Rosemary Salazar v. Lubbock County Hospital Dist We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-10322
Defendant / Appellee: LUBBOCK COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, doing business as University Medical Center
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROSEMARY SALAZAR
Ricky Jones v. Lubbock Cty Hospital District We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-11364
Defendant / Appellee: LUBBOCK COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, doing business as University Medical Center
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICKY JONES
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5227
Plaintiff / Appellee: Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Northeast Georgia Medical Center, 14cv503 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital Company, Llc, 14cv1477, doing business as Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital Company, Llc, Lafayette General Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5082
Plaintiff / Appellee: Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Lubbock County Hospital District, 14cv503, doing business as University Medical Center, Board Of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital, 14cv503, doing business as North Kansas City Hospital, Community Hospital of Brazosport, 14cv503, doing business as Brazosport Regional Health System and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5087
Plaintiff / Appellee: Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Memorial Hospital Flagler, Inc., 15cv192 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Longmont United Hospital, 15-cv-01800, Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?