Cases 11 - 20 of 309
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55556
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HARRIS v. FORRESTER-TROUPE et al
as 3:2023cv10297
Plaintiff:
LUIS MUNUZURI HARRIS
Defendant:
KENA FORRESTER-TROUPE, LUIS LOPEZ-RIVERA, KRISTAL AKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez Guevara v. Garland
as 22-21
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS LOPEZ GUEVARA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jose Luis Lopez-Galindo v. Ixco et al
as 5:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Lopez-Galindo and Jose Ruiz Lopez
Defendant:
Ixco, M. Manker, Mastel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPEZ v. JS LANDSCAPING SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01930
Defendant:
JS LANDSCAPING SERVICES, LLC, JS LANDSCAPING, LLC, J&S LANDSCAPING, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Danny Negrete, Michael Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09097
Plaintiff:
LUIS LOPEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Danny Negrete, Michael Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WAGNER v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07508
Plaintiff:
JAMES WAGNER, JOHNATHAN WAGNER, BOYD A. WALKER, JR. and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Michael Gonzalez, Randy Barcena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
