Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Retana-Estrada, et al. v. Garland
as 23-2140
Petitioner:
ANAISELA RETANA-ESTRADA and JOSE LUIS MEDINA-TAVIRA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez et al v. Mr. Buul Corp.
as 5:2023cv04012
Plaintiff:
Dayana Sanchez, Luis Medina, Joaquin Enzastiga Soto and others
Defendant:
MR BUUL CORP and Mr. Buul Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Medina v. Schumacher Auto Group, Inc.
as 9:2023cv80067
Plaintiff:
Luis Medina
Defendant:
Schumacher Auto Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Johnson v. Garcia et al
as 6:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Juan Garcia, John R. Delapp, Jr., Michael O. McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. DuBois et al
as 7:2022cv08051
Plaintiff:
Luis Medina
Defendant:
Sheriff Carl E. DuBois, Wellpath NY LLC, Doctor Salwa Khouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEDINA ESCAMILLA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16010
Plaintiff:
LUIS MEDINA ESCAMILLA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Medina v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00108
Plaintiff:
Luis Medina
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Medina Carreon v. Garland
as 21-60391
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Medina Carreon
Medina v. North Hills Country Club, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00769
Defendant:
North Hills Country Club, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Luis Medina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jhon Lora, et al v. Baylor, et al
as 20-3297
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. ARMOND, Sgt. at Monroe County Correctional Facility, LT. BAYLOR, Director of Monroe County Correctional Facility, GARY HAIDLE, Warden of Monroe County Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMAON WEBSTER, JUSTIN COATE, JHON LORA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
