Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Seay v. James et al
as 1:2023cv05232
Plaintiff:
Tamika Seay
Defendant:
Lisa James and Antresa Lumpkin-Knighten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler et al v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Darryl Pernell Butler
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Timothy Ward, Ahmed Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Bailey et al
as 1:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Ericka Lumpkin
Defendant:
Turner Bailey and Rachel Bailey
BULLOCK v. BERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BULLOCK
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN LUMPKIN, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BULLOCK v. BERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BULLOCK
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN LUMPKIN, UNIT MANAGER SANFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth v. Lumpkin County Board of Commissioners
as 2:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Sharon Booth
Defendant:
Lumpkin County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
CUMMINGS v. BERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WARDEN BERRY WALTER, DEPUTY ERIC MARTIN, CHIEF CONSELOR WHIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN, CHIEF COUNSELOR PRETRILLION WHIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WILLAMSON et al
as 5:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADDARRYL JONES and TUPAC DAVID SHAKUR
Defendant:
TERRANCE DENNIS, KELSIE WILLIAMSON, WARDEN BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
