Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Lal Bhatia v. USA, et al
as 16-60076
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAL BHATIA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, an entity, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Bhatia v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00011
Plaintiff:
Lal Bhatia
Defendant:
United States of America, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Bhatia v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Lal Bhatia
Defendant:
United States of America, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lal Bhatia v. Eric Holder, et al
as 14-60899
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAL BHATIA
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of Bureau of Prisons and VANCE LAUGHLIN, Warden, Adams County Correctional Center, Natchez, Mississippi
USA v. Lal Bhatia
as 14-15346
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAL BHATIA
Bhatia v. Holder et al
as 5:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Lal Bhatia
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Vance Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bhatia v. USA
as 4:2011cv04875
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lal Bhatia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-17134
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-17089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
