Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jesus v. Lamar Company
as 1:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Father Jesus
Defendant:
Lamar Advertising Company and Lamar Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cooley v. Lamar County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Eva S. Cooley
Defendant:
Lamar County Sheriff Department, Lamar County Jail, The Board of Supervisors Lamar County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jesus v. Lamar Advertisement, LLC
as 1:2021cv00230
Defendant:
Lamar Advertisement, LLC
Plaintiff:
Father Jesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burks v. Lamar County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2021cv00014
Defendant:
Mike Harlin, Harry Magee, William McArthur, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Chett Weston Burks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heritage Hunter Knoll, LLC v. Lamar County, Mississippi
as 2:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Lamar County, Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Heritage Hunter Knoll, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rayburn v. Lamar County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2020cv00148
Defendant:
Rachel Green, Danny Rigel, Lamar County, Mississippi and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Allen Rayburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Browning et al
as 2:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, Municipal of Prentiss, Richard Browning and others
Plaintiff:
Eric De'Juan Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
