Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Chapman et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
Lana Chapman and Robert Chapman
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crosser v. Iowa, State of et al
as 1:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
Skylar Crosser
Defendant:
Iowa, State of , Lana Brockney , Linda Woodruff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00612
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Soboroff v. United States Government et al
as 4:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Alan Soboroff
Defendant:
United States Government, Muscatine County Jail, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 3:2012cv03079
Plaintiff:
Lana Anderson
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Donato et al v. 4 Brothers Bar and Grill, Inc et al
as 5:2009cv04086
Plaintiff:
Lana Donato, Victoria Lane and Adam Donato
Defendant:
4 Brothers Bar and Grill, Inc, Myles Kass and Roberta Kass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fehr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
Lana J. Fehr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cheng v. Fultz et al
as 4:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
Wai Cheng
Defendant:
Karla J Fultz, Kerry Anderson, Kevin Concannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv03038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
