Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Department et al
as 5:2021cv05683
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Defendant:
Lancaster City Police Department, Barry Handwerger, Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 5:2021cv01437
Respondent:
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE
Petitioner:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 5:2020cv01951
Respondent:
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE
Petitioner:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CATERBONE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2018cv02712
Plaintiff:
STAN J. CATERBONE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. GEARTY et al
as 5:2016cv03262
Petitioner:
CORNELIUS BRYANT
Respondent:
JUSTIN C. GEARTY, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REZNICKCHECK v. LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 5:2013mc00098
Petitioner:
JOHN JAMES REZNICKCHECK
Respondent:
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, LANCASTER COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S and LANCASTER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
LYNCH v. VALAZ et al
as 5:2012cv03201
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. LYNCH
Defendant:
MICHELLE VALAZ, THE EAST LAMPETER POLICE DEPARTMENT, DENNIS E. REINECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOSS v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
DARNELL DOSS
Defendant:
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, JOHN BURKHART, LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
