Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Wood v. Cason
as 5:2021cv00294
Defendant:
Keisha E. Cason
Plaintiff:
Darby Lance Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Cason
as 6:2021cv00907
Defendant:
Keisha E. Cason
Plaintiff:
Darby Lance Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster #111069 v. Godoy et al
as 4:2021cv00164
Defendant:
Lance Wood, Teresa Godoy, Thomas Jacob and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. Tennessee Valley Authority et al
as 3:2020cv00592
Plaintiff:
Alicia Daniel
Defendant:
Lance Woods and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv29554
Plaintiff:
LANCE WOOD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. The Alarm Company, LLC, et al
as 16-5535
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
THE ALARM COMPANY, LLC, THOMAS BRADY, SUSAN BRADY and others
Wood et al v. Panther et al
as 1:2015cv00092
Defendant:
Paul Panther, Mark Kubinski, Brent Reinke and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Wood and Renee Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. The Alarm Company, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02636
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
The Alarm Company, LLC, Thomas Brady, Susan Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Urbanczyk v. Buffalo City Police Department, New York et al
as 1:2013cv00357
Plaintiff:
Chris Urbanczyk
Defendant:
Buffalo City Police Department, New York, Dustin Johnson, Lashondra Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADT Services AG et al v. Brady et al
as 2:2010cv02197
Plaintiff:
ADT Services AG and ADT Security Services, Inc.,
Defendant:
Thomas Brady, Susan Brady, Lance Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
