Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Hayes v. Landmark Recovery of Carmel, LLC d/b/a Landmark Recovery of Indianapolis et al
as 1:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Chance Hayes
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Carmel, LLC d/b/a Landmark Recovery of Indianapolis, Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC and Landmark Recovery Management Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jillson et al v. Landmark Recovery of Carmel, LLC, et al
as 3:2023cv01024
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jillson, Jeremy Anderson, Clarissa Davis and others
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Carmel, LLC d/b/a Praxis of South Bend by Landmark Recovery, Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC, Landmark Recovery Management Company, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Richard McDevitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Ebeyer v. Landmark Recovery of Carmel, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
Britnee Ebeyer
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Carmel, LLC d/b/a Praxis of South Bend by Landmark Recovery, Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC, Landmark Recovery Management Company, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Richard McDevitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hartfield et al v. Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
as 1:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Chantal Hartfield, Heidi Niego, Richard Jackson and others
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC d/b/a Praxis of Fort Wayne by Landmark Recovery, Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC, Landmark Recovery Management Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hale v. Landmark Recovery Development Company LLC et al
as 3:2022cv02011
Plaintiff:
Maranda Hale
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery Development Company LLC, Landmark Recovery of Ohio, LLC and Landmark Recovery Management Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
