Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Johnson et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2023cv09045
Plaintiff:
Landon Johnson and Sherri Johnson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp Diversity-Property Damage/Product Liability
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00244
Petitioner:
Morris Landon Johnson, II
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Director
as 6:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
Morris Landon Johnson, II
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson II v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
Morris Landon Johnson II
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson II v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00283
Petitioner:
Morris Landon Johnson II
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coffey v. OK Foods Inc
as 2:2021cv02200
Plaintiff:
Landon Johnson and Clarissa Coffey
Defendant:
OK Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Johnson et al v. OK Foods Inc
as 5:2021cv00561
Defendant:
OK Foods Inc
Plaintiff:
Landon Johnson and Clarissa Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv67280
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LANDON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2018cv00087
Petitioner:
Morris Landon Johnson, II
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2018cv00055
Petitioner:
Morris Landon Johnson, II
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
