Cases 11 - 20 of 1,434
Zero Waste Soluntions, LLC v. Lane Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Zero Waste Soluntions, LLC and Zero Waste Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Lane Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lane v. Complete Maintenance Company
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Ross Lane
Defendant:
Complete Maintenance Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HAWKINS v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
MARK HAWKINS
Defendant:
LANE COLLINS and WAGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paxton Lane Multifamily LP v. Dunn
as 1:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
Paxton Lane Multifamily LP doing business as The Paxton
Defendant:
Valerie Dunn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CadleRock, LLC v. BCL Ventures, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
CadleRock, LLC
Defendant:
BCL Ventures, Inc. and Chance Axton Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Owens, Jr. v. Crews et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Lane, C. Crews, A. Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Demond Grant
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. doing business as AMF Bowling Lanes Savannah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jonchuck, Jr. v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
John N. Jonchuck, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Christopher Lane, Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Jump et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Rebecca J. Walden, Roger B. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
