Cases 21 - 30 of 93
Rubin v. Charter Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv02270
Defendant:
David L. Strobel, Edward D. Smith, David Z. Cauble and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richardson v. Dogba et al
as 8:2018cv01249
Plaintiff:
Dean Richardson
Defendant:
Francis Dogba, Ford and Gerald Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2017cv02265
Petitioner:
Joseph Lane
Respondent:
State of Maryland and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zeller v. Lane et al
as 8:2017cv01016
Plaintiff:
David C. Zeller
Defendant:
Lane, Wolfe, Rowland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SH Franchising, LLC v. Care for All, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00619
Plaintiff:
SH Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Care for All, LLC, Care for All San Diego, Inc., Leonard Lane Klastow and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Hippocratic Growth, LLC et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Queen Anne's County et al
as 1:2017cv00441
Plaintiff:
Hippocratic Growth, LLC , 111 Scher Lane, LLC and 101 Drummer Drive, LLC
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Queen Anne's County and Michael Wisnosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lane v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv01737
Petitioner:
Tyran Antwain Lane
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. Warden
as 1:2016cv00922
Plaintiff:
Bryant Elliott Davis
Defendant:
Warden, State of Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Gerald Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
