Cases 31 - 40 of 163
Lane v. Mendes, et al
as 22-1562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAZMIN MENDES, Social Worker, Department of Children and Families, SABINE TEMPLIER, Social Worker, Department of Children and Families, EVELYN FARRINGTON, Supervisor, Department of Children and Families and others
Lane v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2022cv11145
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
James McCarthy, Frantz Dumond and Nicholas Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lane v. Brigham and Woman Hospital et al
as 1:2022cv11231
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Brigham and Woman Hospital and Carmen Adeluta Vesbianu, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2022cv11144
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
John McCarthy, Frantz Dumond and Nicholas Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Lane v. Boston Children Hospital et al
as 1:2022cv11230
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Boston Children Hospital, Sarah Schlegel and Tamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mendes et al v. Lane
as 1:2022cv10891
Plaintiff:
Jazmine Mendes, Sabine Templier, Evelyn Farrington and others
Defendant:
Luanita Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lane v. Brigham and Women's Hospital, et al
as 22-1503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL, RANDI H. GOLDMAN, MD RAYMOND MANOHAR ANCHAN and others
Lane v. Mendes et al
as 1:2022cv10858
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Jazmine Mendes, Sabine Templier, Evelyn Farrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. Brigham and Women's Hospital
as 22-1502
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
