Cases 31 - 40 of 194
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jester v. Philbin et al
as 1:2021cv00100
Plaintiff:
James Jester
Defendant:
C.O. Chanra Lane, Cedric Taylor, C.O. Lance Martice Briley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Govan v. Navy Federal Financial Group LLC
as 1:2021cv02510
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Govan
Defendant:
Navy Federal Financial Group LLC 820 Follin Lane, Vienna, VA 22180 doing business as Navy Federal Credit Union
Lane et al v. Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
as 1:2021cv02430
Plaintiff:
Tanda Lane, M.D., Tanda Lane, John Paul Booher, II and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv81011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Collings et al v Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00707
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Timothy Allen Jolley, Albertville City, Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
J Monroe Johnson and Eujena Rogers Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chappell v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Dekalb County, Alabama, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy T Buckner and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Coit Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collings v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00655
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Timothy Allen Jolley, Mitchell Scott Floyd and others
Plaintiff:
Eujena Rogers Collings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Marshall County Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00519
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Marshall County Alabama, Timothy Allen Jolley and others
Plaintiff:
J Monroe Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
