Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,533
Murray v. Knapp et al
as 6:2024cv00049
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Erick T Knapp, Lane County DAs Office and Springfield PD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County Adult Corrections
as 6:2024cv00047
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Lane County Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. DA's Office et al
as 6:2024cv00041
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: DA's Office, Erik T. Knap, Judge McAlpine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00050
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Lane County, Erik T. Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County DA's Office
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Lane County DA's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pina v. Martinez et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: John Pina
Defendant: FNU Martinez, FNU Lane and FNU Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pina v. Martinez et al
as 6:2024cv00015
Plaintiff: John Pina
Defendant: FNU Martinez, FNU Lane and FNU Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Chambers et al
as 1:2023cv01462
Plaintiff: Bryant Hart
Defendant: Jason Chambers, Joseph Moran, Matt Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Lane Murray Dept. of Justice
as 7:2023cv00136
Plaintiff: Le'Tura Sanders
Defendant: Lane Murray Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01117
Plaintiff: William Burn Howard
Defendant: James Smith, Chad Marsh, Kevin Galebaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?