Cases 61 - 70 of 955
WASHINGTON v. ARAMARK CORP. et al
as 1:2023cv01305
Plaintiff:
JAMALL WASHINGTON
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORP., CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LANE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. VECTOR SECURITY, INC.
as 2:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Defendant:
VECTOR SECURITY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
LANE v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
JEWEL LANE
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
LANE v. Seilus
as 2:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
CARL LANE
Defendant:
Joseph Seilus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Opticon Inc.
as 1:2022cv01627
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Opticon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Snap One Holdings Corp.
as 1:2022cv01626
Counter Defendant:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Snap One Holdings Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Digital Check Corp.
as 1:2022cv01629
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Digital Check Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
as 1:2022cv01628
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
