Cases 61 - 70 of 485
SAYRE v. BORGHESE LANE, LLC
as 2:2019cv01485
Defendant:
BORGHESE LANE, LLC
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN SAYRE
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
COOMES v. BROWN et al
as 2:2019cv05244
Defendant:
ANN CLARY GORDON, ESQ., SHAPIRO SHER, SHAPIRO SHER GUINOT & SANDLER, P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH COOMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doss v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv01789
Defendant:
Warden Lane, Lt. O'Connor, Chaplain Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Doss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. WOLF et al
as 2:2019cv04582
Petitioner:
DOREL JENKINS and DARRELL ANTHONY JENKINS
Respondent:
JUDGE TIMIKA LANE, JUDGE JACQUELYN FRAZIER LYDE, WARDEN JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HEAD v. CARR et al
as 2:2019cv01246
Defendant:
STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR., MICHAEL D. ANDERSON, CHARLES R. CARR, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLASSEN v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2019cv03864
Respondent:
JUDGE TIMIKA LANE, JOHN DELANEY, D.A. LARRY KRASNER and others
Petitioner:
JOSE M. CLASSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LANE v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv03622
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JESSICA LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAIN STREET BUSINESS FUNDING, LLC et al v. GOLDNER et al
as 2:2019cv03522
Plaintiff:
MAIN STREET BUSINESS FUNDING, LLC and ROBERT S. GOGGIN, III
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. GOLDNER, DOVECOTE LANE, LLC, REGER RIZZO & DARNELL LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
LAYTON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00822
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. LANE C. DEFRANCISO, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rodriguez v. Lane et al
as 3:2019cv01134
Defendant:
Micki Powanda, Elizabeth Stahl and Warden Kathy P. Lane
Plaintiff:
Edwin Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
