Cases 1 - 10 of 189
PERKINS v. RDC SUPERINTENDANT et al
as 1:2024cv01622
Defendant:
CHRIS LANE, RDC SUPERINTENDANT, SHERIFF OF HENDRIX COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUSH v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FAILITY et al
as 1:2024cv01420
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS DEMERROW BUSH
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FAILITY, MARLEX LANEE and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $12,204,262.89 UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 1:2024cv01383
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$12,204,262.89 UNITED STATES CURRENCY and ONE REAL PROPERTY AT 10119 HAMILTON HILLS LANE, FISHERS, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
PERKINS v. LANE
as 1:2024cv01396
Defendant:
CHRIS LANE
Plaintiff:
JAMES PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. LANE
as 1:2024cv01337
Defendant:
CHRIS LANE
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
LANE v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00374
Petitioner:
DAVID HENRY LANE, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00367
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company v. Lu et al
as 3:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Steven Kollar, James F. Lu, Riley Park and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
KERR v. LANE
as 1:2024cv01173
Plaintiff:
ADAM KERR
Defendant:
CHRIS LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
