Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Graham et al v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2023cv01775
Plaintiff:
Weatherly Graham and Justin Lane
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, Sheriff SAM COGEN, Deputy Scottie Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cvp Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Graham et al v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv01777
Plaintiff:
Weatherly Graham and Justin Lane
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, Sheriff Sam Cogen, Deputy Scottie Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Borkowski et al v. Baltimore County, Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv02809
Defendant:
Krystin Richardson, Lane Montgomery, Scott D. Shellenberger and others
Plaintiff:
Anna Borkowski, Katelyn Frank, Kaila Noland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hippocratic Growth, LLC et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Queen Anne's County et al
as 1:2017cv00441
Plaintiff:
Hippocratic Growth, LLC , 111 Scher Lane, LLC and 101 Drummer Drive, LLC
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Queen Anne's County and Michael Wisnosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03739
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv02108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv02088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Quartey v. Lane
as 8:2010cv01511
Plaintiff:
Mary Aku Quartey
Defendant:
Jerry Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
