Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Prince v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01250
Plaintiff:
Wayne Prince, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Allen Bock, Tomas Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Placzek v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01248
Plaintiff:
Thomas Placzek
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Allen Bock, Tomas Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claxton v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01257
Plaintiff:
Richard William Claxton
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Allen Bock, Tomas Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mamoth v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01251
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Mamoth
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Allen Bock, Tomas Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birdwell v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01258
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dale Birdwell
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Allen Bock, Tomas Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claxton et al v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01142
Plaintiff:
Richard William Claxton, Ronald Dale Birdwell, Jimmy Mamoth and others
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Allen Bock, Tomas Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Moore v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, Co, et al
as 09-16273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO, CORPORATION, LANE LIMITED, ACCESS SECUREPAK and others
Thomas Moore v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, Co, et al
as 09-15726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO, CORPORATION, LANE LIMITED, ACCESS SECUREPAK and others
Bedgood v. Donald et al
as 1:2007cv01879
Plaintiff:
Carl A. Bedgood
Defendant:
James E. Donald, James L. Lanier, GA Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canup v. Donald et al
as 1:2007cv01878
Plaintiff:
David H. Canup
Defendant:
James E. Donald, James L. Lanier, GA Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
