Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Langan-Mack v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00076
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. f/k/a Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories Ltd., Sandoz, Inc., Actavis LLC f/k/a Actavis Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Judy Langan-Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Headrick et al v. California Grill LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01073
Defendant:
California Grill LLC doing business as Foxy's Cabaret, Eric S. Langan and Tommy Perkins
Plaintiff:
Sophia Heidler and Tara Headrick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Langan et al v. Abbott et al
as 1:2019cv01182
Defendant:
Ken Paxton and Greg Abbott
Plaintiff:
Teresa De Barbarac, Donna Langan and Alexandra Carson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cecere v. Langan et al
as 4:2019cv03080
Defendant:
Travis Reese, Nour-Dean Anakar, Yura Barabash and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cecere
Grossman v. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02318
Defendant:
Eric Langan, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. and Phillip Marshall
Plaintiff:
David Grossman
Rogers v. 12291 CBW, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00266
Defendant:
Eric Langan and 12291 CBW, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Rogers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1554
Gu v. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv01917
Defendant:
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc., Eric S. Langan and Phillip Marshall
Plaintiff:
Ning Gu
Hoffman v. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv01841
Defendant:
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. and Eric S. Langan
Plaintiff:
Ari Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Godwin et al v. Orcutt et al
as 5:2018cv00133
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Godwin and Krishna Buoy
Defendant:
Nicolai Orcutt, John DeLeon, Eric Langan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Tarver v. 12291 CBW, LLC d/b/a Temptations Cabaret et al
as 4:2017cv00332
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha Tarver
Defendant:
12291 CBW, LLC d/b/a Temptations Cabaret and Eric Langan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
