Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Niese et al v. AllianceBernstein L.P. et al
as 1:2011cv04538
Defendant:
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., TMS/ITS SETT A/C For HFF I LLC, CIM XVI LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John T. Nash, Robert T. Grant, John J. Zakarian and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Carol E Newman, Cutler Group, LP and Cassandra Trading Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Pittman v. U.S. Bank
as 20-40723
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Bank, N.A., as successor of Bank of America, NA,, as successor of LaSalle Bank, N.A., on behalf of Registered Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2006-HE-5, Aset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-HE5, Select Portfolio Servicing, Incorporated and U.S. Bank, N.A., as successor of Bank of America, NA,, as successor of LaSalle Bank, N.A., on behalf of Registered Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2006-HE-5, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-HE5
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cheryl Pittman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv05424
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Corey Spector v. Accredited Home Loans, Inc., et al
as 20-1893
Defendant / Appellee:
Accredited Home Loans, Inc., Select Portfolio Services, Millsap & Singer, P.C., as Trustee and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Corey Spector
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, et al
as 20-15835
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK, N.A., as Successor Trustee to Bank of America, N.A., as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Merrill Lynch First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-5
Defendant:
WARM SPRINGS RESERVE OWNERS ASSOCIATION and ALESSI & KOENIG, LLC
Cross Defendant:
JOHN FOLEY
Counter Claimant:
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC
Wells v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2019cv04605
Plaintiff:
Vernon C. Wells and Jean Winston
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Inv. Inc., Aurora Bank N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anthony Welch v. U.S. Bank, National Assn
as 19-20318
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AS SUCCESSOR TO LASALLE BANK, N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR MERRILL LYNCHFIRST FRANKLIN MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY QUINN WELCH, doing business as Superior Consulting Group
In re: Zoila Sanchez, et al v. U.S. Bank N.A., et al
as 19-60003
Appellee:
U.S. BANK N.A., as trustee, successor in interest to Bank of America N.A. as trustee as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank N.A., as trustee for Certificateholders of Bear Sterns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-H and DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as trustee for Morgan Stanley IXIS Real Estate Capital Trust 2006-2 Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006-2
Debtor:
In re: ZOILA ARELI SANCHEZ
Appellant:
ZOILA ARELI SANCHEZ
Tuyetle Pearson v. Washington Mutual Bank, N.A., et al
as 19-55137
Defendant:
ADAM A. RIGGINS, THE WOLF FIRM, JAMIE DEVOES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHASE BANK, CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, National Association, Chase Home Finance, as Successor-in-interest to Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. (CHASE) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TUYETLE PEARSON, AKA Tuyetle Crouch
Bumpus v. U.S. Bank, National Association, As sucessor by merger to LaSalle Bank, N.A., As trustee for the certificeholders of the MLMI Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-HE6 et al
as 2:2017cv02636
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bumpus
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, National Association, As sucessor by merger to LaSalle Bank, N.A., As trustee for the certificeholders of the MLMI Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-HE6 , Nationstar Mortgage and Rubin Lublin TN, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
