Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Taylor v. Mead Johnson & Company LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01871
Plaintiff:
Latoya Taylor
Defendant:
Mead Johnson & Company LLC, Mead Johnson Nutrition Company and Abbot Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TAYLOR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
as 3:2021cv19891
Plaintiff:
LATOYA TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Inez Elliston et al v. Hyundai Motor Company et al
as 8:2019cv01069
Plaintiff:
Wayne Robertson, Jerry Stanwick, Samantha Bitely and others
Defendant:
Kia Motors America, Inc., Kia Motors Corporation, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inez Elliston et al v. Hyundai Motor Company et al
as 2:2019cv04684
Plaintiff:
Wayne Robertson, Jerry Stanwick, Matthew Raasch and others
Defendant:
Kia Motors Corporation, Kia Motors America, Inc., Hyundai Motor America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Latoya Taylor
as 18-20234
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LATOYA TAYLOR
Taylor v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv10132
Plaintiff:
Latoya Taylor
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Alverez et al v. Recreation By Design, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02305
Plaintiff:
Edna Alverez , Julius Alverez , Patricia Barnes and others
Defendant:
Recreation By Design, LLC, Fluor Enterprises, Inc. , Shaw Environmental, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Horton et al v. County of Sacramento
as 2:2009cv00806
Plaintiff:
Audrey Jones, Charles Rich, Shannon Eubanks and others
Defendant:
County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
