Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Lattimore v. Dell, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
John Lattimore
Defendant:
Dell Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Lattimore
as 24-118
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
YVONNE LATTIMORE
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
United States of America v. Lattimore
as 23-2167
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
YVONNE LATTIMORE
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Dmitry Pronin v. J. Cannon, Jr.
as 21-6517
Defendant / Appellee:
GERALD MATTHEW AUERBACH, SHERIFF J. AL CANNON, JR., M. MARSILLO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DMITRY PRONIN
LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Plaintiff:
LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC., LAFARGE PNW, INC., MEYER MATERIAL COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
LaFarge North America, Inc. et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 1:2019cv06506
Plaintiff:
LaFarge North America, Inc., Lafarge PNW, Inc., Meyer Material Company, LLC and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
