Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jackson v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv00605
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jackson
Defendant:
T. Brown, Martinez, McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Robert Dillon v. Correction Corporation of America, et al
as 22-16152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT J. DILLON
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, DAMON HININGER, CEO, Core Civic Inc., NEVADA SOUTHERN DETENTION CENTER and others
Brittany Adkins, et al v. USA
as 22-5499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY ADKINS, ANITA E. BARBOR, MELISSA A. BEARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Bacon, et al v. Core Civic, et al
as 21-17124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. BACON
Plaintiff:
PETE POLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORE CIVIC, BRIAN KOEHN, Warden, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
North v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02240
Plaintiff:
David North
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Brian Kohen, Pamela Laurer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
North v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02239
Plaintiff:
David North
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Brian Kohen, Pamela Laurer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dillon v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 2:2020cv02319
Defendant:
Mr. Kutz, Mrs. Bonnie Holley, Mrs. Laurer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Dillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chounlaboundy v. Core Civic et al
as 2:2020cv01378
Defendant:
Core Civic, Laurer, Warden Brian Koehn and others
Plaintiff:
Chounlaboudy Soulidao and Soulidao Chounlaboundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
