Cases 1 - 10 of 15
NOT USED
as 2:2019cv02125
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Jame Dzurenda, Steve Wolfson and others
Plaintiff:
Lavern Charles Fasthorse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fasthorse v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2019cv00740
Defendant:
Steve Wolfson, Steve Sisolak, Dwayne Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Lavern Charles Fasthorse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fasthorse v. State of Nevada
as 2:2019cv01441
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Lavern Charles Fasthorse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fasthorse v. State of Nevada
as 2:2019cv01442
Plaintiff:
Lavern Charles Fasthorse
Defendant:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fasthorse v. Howell et al
as 2:2019cv00511
Respondent:
Jerry Howell and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Lavern Charles Fasthorse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fasthorse v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2019cv00196
Defendant:
warden Howell, NDOC/OMD, Childress and others
Plaintiff:
Lavern Charles Fasthorse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FASTHORSE v. USA
as 1:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
LAVERN CHARLES FASTHORSE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Fasthorse v. Trump et al
as 2:2017cv00647
Petitioner:
Lavern Charles Fasthorse
Respondent:
High Desert State Prison, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Dept of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fasthorse v. Warden of High Desert State Prison
as 2:2017cv00446
Petitioner:
Lavern Charles Fasthorse
Respondent:
Warden, High Desert State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fasthorse v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv02495
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Lavern Charles Fasthorse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
