Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jeffrey Powers et al v. Denis Richard McDonough et al
as 2:2022cv08357
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Powers, Deavin Sessom, Laurieann Wright and others
Defendant:
Denis Richard McDonough, Steven Braverman and Keith Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv04603
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
LAVON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIDDICK et al v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv01695
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MILLAN, ALEXANDER GOMEZ, DAVID LEE and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Riddick et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01461
Plaintiff:
Matthew Millan, Alexander Gomez, David Lee and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Aaron Johnson v. Darrell Hart
as 16-10049
Petitioner - Appellant:
AARON LAVON JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL HART
Lavon Johnson v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 15-2787
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAVON JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, ANITA ALVAREZ and LISA MADIGAN
Lavon Johnson v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 15-2787
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAVON JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, ANITA ALVAREZ and LISA MADIGAN
Carrie Murillo et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Carrie Murillo , Michael Murillo , Joseph Hudgins and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv01409
Petitioner:
Lavon Johnson
Respondent:
Thomas Dart, Anita M. Alvarez and Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carrie Murillo, et al v. Vintage Pharmaceuticals. LLC
as 13-80043
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CARRIE MURILLO, MICHAEL MURILLO, a married couple, JOSEPH HUDGINS and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
VINTAGE PHARMACEUTICALS. LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
