Cases 1 - 10 of 150
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Chicago Title Insurance Company v. Gambrel & Wilder Law Offices, PLLC et al
as 6:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Chicago Title Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gambrel & Wilder Law Offices, PLLC, John M. Gambrel and R. Scott Wilder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gardner v. Risk Management Service Company et al
as 5:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Glendrick Gardner
Defendant:
Risk Management Service Company, Ferreri Partner, PLLC and Law Office of James D. Howes, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garth v. LFUCPD et al
as 5:2023cv00104
Defendant:
Revive, LFUCPD, Judge Pamela Goodwine and others
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Garth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fields v. Hopson et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Fields
Defendant:
Jere Dee Hopson, Brad Harper, Stephen Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LEEP, Inc. v. Zielke et al
as 3:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
LEEP, Inc.
Defendant:
Laurence Zielke and Zielke Law Firm, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
