Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Nagel v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2019cv00201
Defendant:
Bill LNU, Charles Tynon, Jose Doorman and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00189
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kaleohano v. Midland Funding, LLC, et al
as 1:2019cv00147
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC, Jason M. Oliver and Law Offices of Marvin S.C. Dang, LLLC
Plaintiff:
Hollyane Kaleohano
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nagel v. 425 Park South Tower Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Jose "Perez", Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. Saakvitne et al
as 1:2018cv00155
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Nicholas L. Saakvitne, Nichlas L. Saakvitne, a Law Corporation, Brian J. Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Stone v. City of Philadelphia et al
as 1:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
Nanette Stone
Defendant:
City of Philadelphia, City of Philadelphia Probate Court, City of Philadelphia City Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Federal Trade Commission v. Consumer Defense, LLC et al
as 1:2018mc00024
Receiver:
Edward Chang
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Consumer Defense, LLC, Consumer Link, Inc., Preferred Law, PLLC and others
In Re: Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest
as 1:2017mc00269
Objector:
Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest, Inc.
Defendant:
Anil Uskanli
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
