Cases filed in Pennsylvania
PERSICHINI et al v. NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01775
Plaintiff: MICHAELA PERSICHINI and MATTHEW LAWLOR
Defendant: NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
LAWLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2021cv00073
Petitioner: DONALD LAWLOR
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V. MOSER and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALI v. PAUP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00280
Defendant: RACQUEL, KATAYOUN COPELAND, JOHN HOSIER and others
Plaintiff: ANWAR SHARIF ALI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARPENTERS PENSION AND ANNUITY PLAN OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY et al v. ROTWITT et al
as 2:2018cv03714
Defendant: MID ATLANTIC REAL ESTATE GROUP II, LLC, RFLP, L.P., BERET, L.P. and others
Plaintiff: CARPENTERS PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY, JAMES R. DAVIS, WILLIAM R. WATERKOTTE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
LAWLOR v. ASTRUE
as 5:2011cv03320
Plaintiff: PATRICIA C. LAWLOR
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LAWLOR v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv67452
Plaintiff: DENIS LAWLOR, SR
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, RAPID AMERICAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWLOR v. ASTRUE
as 2:2009cv02289
Plaintiff: PATRICIA C. LAWLOR
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Berrettini et al v. McClure et al
as 3:2008cv01465
Plaintiff: Albert Leo Berrettini, Jr. and Mary Ann Berrettini
Defendant: James F. McClure, Jr., Wayne P. Samuelson, Martin C. Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?