Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Limon v. USA
as 1:2024cv00049
Petitioner: Lawrence Keith Limon
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lawrence Johnson v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 19-10407
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant: LAWRENCE KEITH JOHNSON
Johnson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2017cv80144
Plaintiff: Lawrence Keith Johnson
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Lawrence McNeill
as 17-50085
Movant: In re: LAWRENCE KEITH MCNEILL
Lawrence Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 17-10273
Petitioner - Appellant: LAWRENCE KEITH JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2016cv81835
Plaintiff: Lawrence Keith Johnson
Defendant: Secretary, Department of Corrections , State of Florida and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv10086
Petitioner: Lawrence Keith Johnson
Defendant: Secretary, Department of Corrections , State of Florida and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Lawrence McNeill
as 15-50594
Movant: In re: LAWRENCE KEITH MCNEILL
McNeill v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00213
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Petitioner: Lawrence Keith McNeill
Respondent: William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNeill v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00178
Petitioner: Lawrence Keith McNeill
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?