Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Smith v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00797
Plaintiff:
Pamela Smith
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Thorson v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 11-60541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER ERIC THORSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman and JIM HOOD
Marsaw et al v. Shelby et al
as 3:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Marsaw and Tanya Marsaw
Defendant:
George Shelby, Trischelle Johnson, Michael Adams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thorson v. Epps et al
as 4:2008cv00129
Plaintiff:
Roger Thorson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker, et al v. Epps, et al
as 08-60652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN DALE WALKER, PAUL EVERETTE WOODWARD and GERALD JAMES HOLLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman
Walker et al v. Epps
as 4:2007cv00176
Plaintiff:
Alan Dale Walker, Alan Dale Walker, Earl Wesley Berry and others
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Estate of Michael Davenport, Deceased v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2007cv00076
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Michael Davenport, Deceased
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christoper Epps, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv01519
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Kelly
Defendant:
City of New York, David Leonardi and Unidentified New York City Police Officers, Employees and Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
