Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund et al v. Sand R Architectural Metals, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01327
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund, Board of Trustees, International Training Institute for the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Industry, National Energy Management Institute Committee and others
Defendant: Robert Lawrence Scott, S&R Architectural Metals, Inc., Does 1 through 20 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Andrus v. Christensen
as 1:2018cv00156
Petitioner: Lawrence Scott Andrus
Respondent: Jay Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. S & R Architectural Metals Incorporated et al
as 2:2017mc00018
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada , Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada , Board of Trustees of the Southern California Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee and others
Defendant: S & R Architectural Metals Incorporated, Roy Dell Maple, Robert Lawrence Scott and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
State Farm Mutual Automobile I v. Iain Morris, et al
as 16-16455
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation
Defendant: IAIN MORRIS
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: LAWRENCE SCOTT BUCKNELL
Type: Contract Insurance
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. S and R Architectural Metals, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv01375
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Industry Fund of Orange Empire, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Local 105 Retiree Health Plan and others
Defendant: Carl Dean Edwards, Roy Dell Maple, S and R Architectural Metals, Inc. and others
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. S and R Architectural Metals, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00565
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Industry Fund of Orange Empire, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 105 Retiree Health Plan and others
Defendant: Carl Dean Edwards, Roy Dell Maple, S and R Architectural Metals, Inc. and others
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation et al v. S and R Architectural Metals, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07209
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees for the Carpenters Southwest Trusts and Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation
Defendant: Does, Carl Dean Edwards, Roy Dell Maple and others
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. S & R Architectural Metals, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01987
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Industry Fund of Orange Empire, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 105 Retiree Health Plan, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant: Carl Dean Edwards, Roy Dell Maple, S and R Architectural Metals, Inc and others
Scott v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00555
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Cody Lawrence Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMullen v. State of Alaska et al
as 3:2012cv00242
Plaintiff: Lawrence Scott McMullen
Defendant: State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Debbie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?