Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Piper Rountree v. Harold Clarke
as 17-6677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PIPER ANN ROUNTREE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLENE DAVIS, Assistant to Gary L. Bass, Virginia Department of Corrections, PHYLLIS BASKERVILLE, Prior Warden, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, GARY L. BASS, Regional Adminstrator Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2016cv01330
Plaintiff:
Belialyanwu I. Williams
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia Department of Corrections, Meirs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yo v. Layton Lester
as 14-7863
Petitioner - Appellant:
YO, f/k/a Mario L. Ballard
Respondent - Appellee:
LAYTON T. LESTER, Warden of LCC
John Beaman v. Deputy Director
as 12-7136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN H. BEAMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, Community Corrections, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, LOU CEI, Special Programs Manager and others
Powers v. Clarke et al
as 3:2011cv00763
Plaintiff:
James Powers
Defendant:
Harold Clarke and Layton T. Lester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrow v. Lester
as 2:2010cv00550
Petitioner:
Reginald Jake Farrow
Respondent:
Layton T. Lester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Farrow v. Lester
as 7:2010cv00497
Petitioner:
Reginald Jake Farrow
Respondent:
Layton T. Lester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Latif Rashe'd v. Gene Johnson
as 09-7667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LATIF RASHE'D
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, FRED SCHILLING, Medical Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, LAYTON T. LESTER, Warden, James River Correctional Center and others
Javen Kiernan v. P. McKinley
as 09-7551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAVEN KIERNAN
Defendant - Appellee:
P. MCKINLEY, R.N. and LAYTON T. LESTER, Warden
Age v. Lester et al
as 1:2008cv01337
Plaintiff:
David W. Age
Defendant:
Layton T. Lester, P. McKinley and Purcell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
