Cases 11 - 20 of 123
In re Eastman Kodak Company Securities Litigation
as 22-2788
Plaintiff:
Tiandong Tang, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Margaretha Welkhammer, Jimmie A. McAdams, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Les Investissements Kiz Inc., Lead Plaintiff and UAT Trading Service, Inc., Lead Plaintiff
Defendant / Appellee:
Eastman Kodak Company, James V. Continenza, David Bullwinkle and others
Defendant:
George Karfunkel
Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawai, et al v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al
as 22-16501
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE STATE OF HAWAII, Lead Plaintiff
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A. MULLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, C. ALLEN PARKER, JOHN R. SHREWSBERRY and others
In re: Ali Alavi, et al v. Genius Brands International, Inc., et al
as 22-55760
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GENIUS BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALI ALAVI and A LEGACY FOUNDATION, Lead Plaintiffs; On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff:
SALVADOR VERDIN and VINCENT CONTORNO, Consol Plaintiff
Defendant / Appellee:
GENIUS BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC., ANDY HEYWARD and ROBERT DENTON
Defendant:
LYNNE SEGALL, Consol Defendant, MICHAEL KLEIN, Consol Defendant, MARGARET LOESCH, Consol Defendant and others
Houston Municipal Employees Pension System, et al v. Mattel, Inc., et al
as 22-55686
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MATTEL INC SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HOUSTON MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES PENSION SYSTEM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DEKALB COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, lead Plaintiff and NEW ORLEANS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Appellant:
JAMES J. HAYES
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTEL, INC., MARGARET H. GEORGIADIS, JOSEPH J. EUTENEUER and others
Andrew Zenoff v. Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc., et al
as 22-55641
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SORRENTO THERAPEUTICS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW R. ZENOFF, Lead Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
SORRENTO THERAPEUTICS, INC., HENRY JI and MARK R. BRUNSWICK
City of Sunrise Firefighters' Pension Fund, et al v. ORCL, et al
as 22-80048
Respondent:
CITY OF SUNRISE FIREFIGHTERS' PENSION FUND, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and UNION ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDING AG, Appointed Lead Plaintiff
Petitioner:
ORACLE CORPORATION, SAFRA A. CATZ, PAULA R. HURD, as Trustee of the Hurd Family Trust and others
Ed Hershewe, et al v. JOYY, Inc., et al
as 22-55377
Plaintiff:
ED J. HERSHEWE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEDION DEMMISSIE and SURESH GOYAL, Co-Lead Plaintiffs
Defendant / Appellee:
JOYY, INC., FKA YY, Inc., DAVID XUELING LI, BING JIN and others
Amalgamated Bank, et al v. Facebook, Inc., et al
as 22-15077
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FACEBOOK, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMALGAMATED BANK, Lead Plaintiff, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI and JAMES KACOURIS, individually and on behalf of all others similary situated
Defendant / Appellee:
FACEBOOK, INC., MARK ZUCKERBERG, SHERYL SANDBERG and others
James Boykin v. K12, Inc.
as 21-2351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES BOYKIN, lead plaintiff per order dated on, ADNAN SAEED and CHAN-HEE KOH
Defendant / Appellee:
K12, INC., NATHANIEL A. DAVIS and TIMOTHY MEDINA
Empls Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
as 21-3993
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JONES
Defendant / Appellant:
FIRSTENERGY CORP and FIRSTENERGY CORP.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
