Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Taylor v. LeadPoint, Inc.
as 8:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
Robin Taylor
Defendant:
LeadPoint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nathen Barton v. LeadPoint, Inc., et al
as 22-35691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHEN W. BARTON
Defendant / Appellee:
LEADPOINT, INC. and RELIANCE FIRST CAPITAL LLC
Defendant:
LOANDEPOT.COM LLC, GLOBAL EQUITY FINANCE, INC. and NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Tamara Miller v. Leadpoint, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02411
Plaintiff:
Tamara Miller
Defendant:
Leadpoint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nathen Barton v. LeadPoint, Inc., et al
as 22-35130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHEN W. BARTON
Defendant / Appellee:
LEADPOINT, INC. and RELIANCE FIRST CAPITAL LLC
Defendant:
LOANDEPOT.COM LLC, GLOBAL EQUITY FINANCE, INC. and NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Jordan Wetzel v. Leadpoint Inc
as 2:2021cv08419
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wetzel
Defendant:
Leadpoint Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Christie Lewis et al v. Leadpoint, Inc.
as 2:2021cv08239
Plaintiff:
Christie Lewis and Luisa Malolo
Defendant:
Leadpoint, Inc., Leadpoint, Inc. doing business as FHA Rate Guide and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barton v. LeadPoint Inc et al
as 3:2021cv05372
Defendant:
Global Equity Finance Inc., LoanDepot.com LLC, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Nathen Barton and Nathen W Barton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Thomas v. LeadPoint, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00522
Plaintiff:
Jerry Thomas
Defendant:
LeadPoint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Waterbury v. LeadPoint, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01279
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 10 and LeadPoint, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven Waterbury
Brennan Landy v. Leadpoint, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00915
Plaintiff:
Brennan Landy
Defendant:
Leadpoint, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
