Cases 1 - 10 of 996
Russell v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Tallapoosa County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08011
Petitioner:
John Lee Neal
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Mitchell
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Roderick Lee Williams
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell
Murphy v. Officer Kopps(Inmate 1)
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Murphy
Defendant:
Officer Kopps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Jefferson County Clerks Office et al
as 2:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Preston Kennedy Lee
Defendant:
Jefferson County Clerks Office, Jacqueline Anderson Smith and Joey Page
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCreary v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Roger Lee McCreary
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell and A.D.O.C.
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Jefferson County Courthouse et al
as 2:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Jefferson County Courthouse, Jefferson County Jail, Judge Shelly Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
