Cases 1 - 10 of 800
Alexander v. Washington County et al
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Philemon Alexander
Defendant:
Washington County, B. Jenkins, Ruipert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Perry et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee
Defendant:
Grady Perry, Amber Paden and CoreCivic/SCCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Jafarris Deon Miller
Defendant:
Lee Harris, Tgichona Baldwin, Anthony Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02225
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners, Kirk Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Jacorey King
Defendant:
Warden Rose, Officer McCrainey, Unknown Transportation Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Makupson v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anthony Makupson
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Glenn Jacobs, Chief Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liles v. Bledsoe County Correctional Complex
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Liles
Defendant:
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keach v. Ashly et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Keach
Defendant:
Ashly Taylor Martin, Stephen Taylor and Mary Beth Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Wardlow
as 1:2024cv01043
Petitioner:
Kelly Lee Pitts
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Lee Malone
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
