Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Terry BattleIn re: Terry Battle
as 23-14182
Petitioner:
In re: TERRY LEE BATTLE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
BATTLE v. MIMS
as 5:2023cv00487
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE BATTLE
Respondent:
CHARLES M MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Battle v. State Board of Pardons and Parole Members et al
as 1:2023cv03966
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Battle
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Parole Members and Crystal L. Moon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Carr et al
as 1:2022cv02761
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Battle
Defendant:
Chris Carr, Paula K. Smith, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marreon McGlory, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 21-2692
Plaintiff:
MARREON MCGLORY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE BATTLE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE BROWN, Warden, Kinross Correctional, ROBERT MILLER, Warden, Chippewa Correctional, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON and others
Battle v. Carr et al
as 1:2021cv01308
Respondent:
Chris M. Carr, Darrin Myers, Paula K. Smith and others
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Battle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oppenheimer v. Old Cashiers Realty, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01099
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Mark Lee Battle, Old Cashiers Realty, Inc. and Kenneth Richard Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Battle v. USA-2255
as 8:2020cv01379
Petitioner:
Russell Lee Battle
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BATTLE v. INCH et al
as 3:2020cv05494
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS LEE BATTLE
Defendant:
MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Illinois River Correctional Center et al
as 1:2020cv01175
Defendant:
S Naber, Illinois River Correctional Center, . Phelps and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Battle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
