Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Steven Lee Coleman v. Los Angeles County Jails et al
as 2:2023cv05679
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Coleman
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Jails and Staff Responsible for living Areas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman #337202 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01619
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Coleman
Respondent:
David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman #337202 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05246
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Coleman
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01626
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Coleman
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donald Coleman v. Brian Williams, Sr.
as 17-70119
Petitioner:
DONALD LEE COLEMAN
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr.
Coleman #073037 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv02964
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Mark Jones and others
Petitioner:
Ernest Lee Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2015cv02771
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Coleman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coleman v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv02432
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Ernest Lee Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sylvester Lee Coleman Jr v. Los Angeles County Jail for Men et al
as 2:2012cv10773
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Lee Coleman
Defendant:
Senior Deputy Lainy and Los Angeles County Jail for Men
Coleman v. Los Angeles County Jail for Men et al
as 3:2012cv02961
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Lee Coleman, Jr.
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Jail for Men and Lainy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
