Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Robertson v. LeFever
as 1:2026cv00570
Petitioner:
Shelitha Robertson
Respondent:
Warden M. M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bryant v. LeFever
as 1:2026cv00565
Petitioner:
Branea Bryant
Respondent:
M. M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Joseph v. LeFever
as 1:2026cv00540
Petitioner:
Valerie Joseph
Respondent:
Warden M. M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brawley v. Lefevers
as 1:2026cv00539
Petitioner:
Andrea Shook Brawley and Andrea Elizabeth Shook
Respondent:
Alderson FPC Warden Lefevers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hickman v. Walters et al
as 3:2026cv00834
Petitioner:
Jamar Edjuan Hickman
Respondent:
Joseph W. Walters and Mariea LeFevers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. LeFever
as 1:2026cv00499
Petitioner:
Crystal Denise James
Respondent:
Warden Molly LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Krause v. LeFever
as 1:2026cv00455
Petitioner:
Toni Krause and Toni Jean Velasquez-Gregg
Respondent:
Molly LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Phillips v. LeFever et al
as 1:2026cv00446
Plaintiff:
Danielle A. Phillips
Defendant:
Warden Molly LeFever, Officer Upton, Officer Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stout v. LeFever
as 1:2026cv00427
Petitioner:
Susanne Lee Stout
Respondent:
M. M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Warrick v. LeFever
as 1:2026cv00414
Petitioner:
Alishia Nicole Warrick
Respondent:
Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
