Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Serrano et al v. Lehi City et al
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Donnalyn Serrano and Jose Serrano
Defendant:
Lehi City and Russell Poulsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beales et al v. Duffield et al
as 2:2023cv00915
Plaintiff:
Toren Beales, Carli Brady and Michael Srygler
Defendant:
Thomas Duffield and Lehi City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paciorek v. Lehi City et al
as 2:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Michael Paciorek
Defendant:
Lehi City, Lehi Police Department, Mark Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tanner v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Joelle Tanner
Defendant:
Nolan Jenkins and Lehi City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Exotic Smoke and Vape et al v. Cox et al
as 2:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Exotic Smoke and Vape, House of Hookah Smoke Shop, iVape a Utah limited liability company doing business as iVapeSLC'S 1 Stop Shop and others
Defendant:
Spencer J. Cox, Nathan Checketts, Angela Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McNalley v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv01021
Plaintiff:
Patricia McNalley
Defendant:
Jeffrey Allan Smith, Blake D. Fenn, Tanner Grow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. State of Utah, et al
as 16-4199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, ALPINE CITY, AMERICAN FORK CITY and others
Webb v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
David Webb
Defendant:
State of Utah, Alpine City, American Fork City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Youngblood v. Lehi City
as 2:2014cv00769
Petitioner:
Gregory Youngblood
Respondent:
Lehi City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kojima v. Lehi City et al
as 2:2013cv00755
Plaintiff:
Shane Kojima
Defendant:
Lehi City , Lehi City Prosecutors Office and Lehi City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
