Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Guthrie v. Becker et al
as 5:2021cv00505
Defendant:
Leighton Franz Becker, Danny Turner, Christopher D Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Clay Guthrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reger v. Keller et al
as 1:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Presiding Judge Dean Rucker, Landon A. Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Jay Reger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Warden FCC Yazoo City Low
as 3:2018cv00862
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
Warden FCC Yazoo City Low
Petitioner:
Leighton Martin Curtis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cannon v. State of Texas
as 4:2017cv00627
Petitioner:
James Cannon
Respondent:
Leighton Isles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chacon v Iles
as 4:2017cv00538
Petitioner:
Adrian Lee Chacon
Respondent:
Leighton Iles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ferrell v. Iles et al
as 4:2016cv00625
Petitioner:
Montrail Ferrell
Respondent:
Leighton Iles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramon Colman v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 13-11235
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAMON COLMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and LEIGHTON ISLES, Director of Community Supervision and Corrections Department of Tarrant County, Texas
Colman v. State of Texas-Judge Brent Carr
as 4:2013cv00593
Petitioner:
Ramon Colman
Respondent:
Leighton Isles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farhia Gohe v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 13-10384
Petitioner - Appellant:
FARHIA HAIBE GOHE
Respondent - Appellee:
LEIGHTON ILES, Director of the Community Supervision and Corrections Department in Tarrant County, Texas
Farhia Gohe v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 13-10289
Petitioner - Appellant:
FARHIA HAIBE GOHE
Respondent - Appellee:
LEIGHTON ILES, Director of the Community Supervision and Corrections Department in Tarrant County, Texas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
