Cases 11 - 20 of 42
MITCHELL v. OBRIEN et al
as 2:2016cv03556
Plaintiff:
ERIC SCOTT MITCHELL
Defendant:
EDMOND OBRIEN, DENNIS LEIGHTON, KEITH M. BERTRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RETZLER v. LEIGHTON et al
as 2:2014cv04718
Plaintiff:
WESTLEY A. RETZLER
Defendant:
DENNIS LEIGHTON, JAMES P. MCANDREW, KEVIN BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Chung v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00490
Plaintiff:
Leighton Chung
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hammond v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al
as 3:2013cv02322
Plaintiff:
Tyler Hammond
Defendant:
City of Wilkes-Barre and Thomas M. Leighton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leighton et al v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2013cv02018
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Leighton and Nancy A. Leighton
Defendant:
Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. , Chesapeake Energy Corporation , Nomac Drilling, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. LEIGHTON
as 2:2013cv03996
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , RUTH JAMES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Defendant:
WARREN R. LEIGHTON
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604 a IRS: Complaint to Enforce IRS Summons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reisinger v. Conner et al
as 3:2012cv02553
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Reisinger
Defendant:
Richard L. Conner, Prashant Shitut , Joseph Butkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reisinger v. Connor et al
as 3:2012cv02117
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Reisinger
Defendant:
Richard L. Connor, Prashant Shitut, Joseph Butkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEIGHTON
as 1:2012cv00143
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PATRICK J. LEIGHTON
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
