Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Naranjo et al v. City of Redwood City et al
as 4:2019cv01549
Defendant:
JR Gamez, Joe Farrow, Carlos Bolanos and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Naranjo, D. B., A. B. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fonua et al v. The City of San Mateo et al
as 3:2009cv05983
Plaintiff:
Kalake Fonua and Kenneth Ashton Fonua
Defendant:
The City of San Mateo, San Mateo Police Department, Susan E. Manheimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fonua et al v. The City of San Mateo et al
as 4:2009cv05983
Plaintiff:
Kalake Fonua and Kenneth Ashton Fonua
Defendant:
The City of San Mateo , San Mateo Police Department , Susan E. Manheimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01652
Plaintiff:
Herbert E. Miller
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Christine Kirby, CitiMortgage Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Miller v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 2:2009cv01599
Plaintiff:
Herbert E. Miller
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Christine Kirby, Citimortgage, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Miller v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 2:2009at00911
Plaintiff:
Herbert E. Miller
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, CEO, CHRISTINE KIRBY, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
David B Bartholomew v. Pasadena Tournament of Roses Association Inc et al
as 8:2008cv01391
Plaintiff:
David B Bartholomew
Defendant:
Pasadena Tournament of Roses Association Inc, Lathrop K Leishman, Stanley L Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Newman v. Leishman
as 5:2007cv00518
Plaintiff:
Charles Newman
Defendant:
S Leishman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
