Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
DRAPER v. NEWMAN et al
as 2:2023cv01517
Petitioner:
PIERRE LEMONE DRAPER
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. NEWMAN and DWIGHT KELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DRAPER v. WARDEN, MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2022cv01022
Petitioner:
LEMONE-PIERRE DRAPER
Respondent:
WARDEN, MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richardson v. Edmondson et al
as 3:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
Orlander Richardson
Defendant:
Rhonda Edmondson, Kimberly Lemons and R.N. Provider Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
LEMONS v. MEGUERIAN et al
as 2:2021cv01737
Defendant:
STEFAN P. KRUSZEWSKI and GAREN MEGUERIAN
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA LEMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DeRaffele v. Jones et al
as 4:2020cv02427
Plaintiff:
John DeRaffele
Defendant:
Jamie Saleski, Mark Lemon and Hon. Judge Hugh Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLERING v. ALL STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS LEMON LAW et al
as 2:2020cv06343
Defendant:
BOSCH AUTOMOTIVE, ALL AUTO MANUFACTURES, ALL AUTO INSURANCE COMPANIES and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT LYNN BALLERING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEMONS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06243
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
BRENDA LEMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROYAL v. THE CITY OF WASHINGTON et al
as 2:2016cv01260
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. ROYAL, JR.
Defendant:
THE CITY OF WASHINGTON and ROBERT LEMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
