Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sanner et al v. Perez Ordonez et al
as 2:2023cv02429
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Robert Sanner and Ryan Owen Lemons
Defendant:
Efrain Perez Ordonez and Odeca Contracting LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
United States of America v. Miles et al
as 6:2019cv01072
Defendant:
Randall J. Bathurst, Ondre Lemone Miles, Nicole Miles and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Lemon Rodriguez
as 5:2015cv04913
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lacey Jo Lemon Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kastner v. Intrust Bank et al
as 6:2012cv01345
Plaintiff:
Kristofer Thomas Kastner
Defendant:
Intrust Bank , Intrust Financial Corporation , C.Q. Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lemon v. Southeast Kansas Independent Living Resource Center, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv01309
Plaintiff:
Rebecca A. Lemon
Defendant:
Southeast Kansas Independent Living Resource Center, Inc. and Shari Coatney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Kastner v. Intrust Bank et al
as 6:2010cv01012
Plaintiff:
Kristofer Thomas Kastner
Defendant:
Intrust Bank, C.Q. Chandler, Roger W. Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hawkins v. Lemons et al
as 5:2009cv03116
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Hawkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl Lemons, Fongvilay Phommachanh, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemon v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2007cv02009
Plaintiff:
Max E. Lemon, Jr.
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
